Page 4 of 4

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:30 pm
by EdwardMcRichy
Quick question, I'm using the R9M and one of it's previous updates made a change to the 1w power mode so it essentially starts at 100mw and changes power up to 1w as the RSSI signal gets weaker. Is this update reflected in the latest test versions of firmware? I was looking at the test versions page and didn't see it in the notes. The version of firmware I was using on my QX7 is the 221 from the ER9x.com site. Just updated to 222d2. thanks in advance.

https://www.frsky-rc.com/r9m/

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:38 pm
by budavaril
MikeB wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 11:33 pm
I have posted r222 c9, which supports the R9M flex firmware on most radios.

Mike
openrcforums.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=123&t=10792&sid=81f66c540e993eb4bb43e38e4e298c5a&start=30

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 9:53 am
by AlessB
Mike, what is the difference release in 20 may and 21 may (222 release)?

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 9:55 am
by budavaril
One of the "curve" screen had some line missing bottom of the screen.
mentero wrote:HI,

Found a couple of lines missing at the right and bottom of the edit curve screen.

Version is 222 19.05.2019 and radio is 9XR.Pro but on a different box, with the inverted screen option checked, so maybe it is only just my radio.

Best,
Miguel



Image

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 10:35 am
by budavaril
Mike, is there any difference between this 222 release ( 21 may ) and 222d4 related of the 9xrPro?
Is this actualy can calling as R222d5 or "just" a collection of "everything until now" ?

Thanks,
Laszlo

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 3:14 pm
by MikeB
There are a couple of (small) bug fixes, like the curve graph above. The main change since "d4" is support for the FrSky X9Lite and the ACCESS protocol on it.

Mike

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 3:27 pm
by budavaril
Thanks Mike for your answer.
By the way ACCESS protocol....
Do you have any information (what you allowed to share with us) about on "old" R9M, will be possible to using ACCESS protocol if we just change the firmware or there any hardware difference(s), or may already available just this new firmware was missing for the controller?

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 7:09 pm
by MikeB
I think it will be able to use ACCESS. Keep an eye on this page: https://www.frsky-rc.com/frsky-advanced ... l-release/ to see what is being released and when.

Mike

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 7:22 pm
by budavaril
Thank you Mike. Sounds we have a hope.

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Thu May 23, 2019 6:07 am
by vodkabears
Hi Mike. Is "21-May-2019 23:55" version the one that will be published at er9x.com?

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Thu May 23, 2019 2:29 pm
by MikeB
I'm just testing on several different radios, and found small bugs that are only on some. When I fix them, I build all the binary files to make sure I haven't caused any problems on other radios.
So this will be the version published, unless you are using a radio with a fixed bug (!), but there may be a new date.

Yesterday I found a problem with the top display on the X9E. That does not affect any of the other radios, but I have recompiled all the binaries.

Mike

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 4:31 pm
by ufoDziner
Hello,
I'm interested in using Ersky9x on an X-Lite (original version). Does the erskyTx for X9Lite (R222) file include the reduced latency work you've done? I'll be using it with a crossfire micro, so I'm not sure that it makes a difference, but figured it would be worth asking anyway. Thanks!

Re: Ersky9x Test Versions

Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 8:24 am
by Rad
Hi Mike, not sure if this is the correct thread to write this.
I am experiencing the same glitch for quite a long time, with 9xtreme, and a 6 position switch.
If I turn the 6pos switch slowly, there is no problem, but If I turn it from pos 1 to 6 fast, the reversed color screen changes to nomal (I use reverse as default)

Video here: https://youtu.be/oNWnREkTcjU
I am using ersky9xProvR222d4, but with older versions I had the same issue.
My 9xr pro is fine.

EDIT: I have seen there is a bugs thread. Please somebody delete this post.

Re: ErskyTx Test Versions

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2019 4:50 pm
by 3blake7
tried the x9 lite rom in:
ersky9xProvR222.zip 16-Jun-2019 20:51

Everything works, it binds (the x9lite rom on www.er9x.com wouldn't bind). I originally tried this because of dropout issues with D16 on SPI FrSky boards. Still having dropouts but they seem less frequent compared to OpenTx 2.3.0

https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthr ... ers/page14

Re: ErskyTx Test Versions

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2019 5:23 pm
by Kilrah
There will likely be changes to be made in the BF SPI code for it to work well with the new radios. It's not related to the radio's operating system, but to the RF module.

Re: ErskyTx Test Versions

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2019 10:16 pm
by 3blake7
Kilrah wrote:
Sat Jul 06, 2019 5:23 pm
There will likely be changes to be made in the BF SPI code for it to work well with the new radios. It's not related to the radio's operating system, but to the RF module.
ok. people on rcgroups were saying the issue wasn't happening with pre 2.2.2 OpenTx and ErSkyTx, so I thought I would give it a try.

Re: ErskyTx Test Versions

Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2019 7:12 am
by Kilrah
OpenTX / ersky9x only have very little influence over what's sent over the air - all we can do is tell the module in what mode to operate with which options, and give it channel data. This works with everything but SPI receivers in the FC boards, which have tried to reimplement the RF protocol by reverse-engineering. Only possibility is that this has been done incompletely/incorrectly and something that is perfectly normal somehow throws it off.
We can't really help with that since we don't know anything about the actual RF sent out by the module.

Re: ErskyTx Test Versions

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:17 pm
by SabreJet
What's the status of ErskyTX for the Jumper T16? Anything available?

Re: ErskyTx Test Versions

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 8:52 pm
by MikeB
I have a version of erskyTx that runs OK on the T16, although I haven't published it yet. I may do so very soon. Note that, as with the 9XR-PRO when it first came out, the use of FrSky 'X' and FrSky 'D' protocols is disabled on the T16 until Jumper reach an agreement with FrSky to allow their use (which HK did for the 'PRO).

Mike

Re: ErskyTx Test Versions

Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:49 pm
by Galand
Hi Mike,
Any progress on the T16 front?