New features provided by open9x

[mhotar]

Nice. First parameter is sufficient. Not all chars look nice when made bold by shifting.

[cre8tiveleo]

looks like poo. looks like an un finished font.

[Kilrah]

Anything better to suggest?

[Rob Thomson]

To clarify... is the purpose behind this to make show the value as 'dimmed out' when filtering the mix?

How about italics?

[mhotar]

Bold numbers only?

snapshot_07.png (1.74 KiB) Viewed 9835 times

snapshot_47.png (1.62 KiB) Viewed 9835 times

[Kilrah]

To clarify... is the purpose behind this to make show the value as 'dimmed out' when filtering the mix?

How about italics?

The goal is to show which mixers, D/Rs, custom switches, function switches,... are active at a given time.
Italics can't really be done without a new, separate font, and that's not possible on the stock board as it would take too much flash. Needs to be a simple variation of the current font. Compromises as usual...
Could also simply invert CHx and the add/replace/multiply symbols instead of bolding them, like is currently done for the custom switches..

I like this one best so far:

[mhotar]

Italic without extra font.

snapshot_49.png (1.65 KiB) Viewed 9831 times

[Kilrah]

Yup, it's worse

[Rob Thomson]

What about inverting the colour on the row? So dark background, light text?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Peter]

Looks great.And on arm we could use a real bold font.
Is it easy to implement it to for expo/dual/triple rates? That would be very handy.
I think the current rates screen is hard to understand compared to er9x and could use some help/love.

[bertrand35]

For DR/EXPOS?

snapshot_06.png (1.19 KiB) Viewed 9836 times

I was annoyed with this one, there is not always something in first column...

Bertrand.

[Rob Thomson]

Do we have space for a 2px verical line right on the far right?

You could show/hide the block if the mix is active.

[bertrand35]

Don't forget that we will have a scrollbar on ARM there
Bertrand.

[Rob Thomson]

Ah.. oh well

Maybe on the left? But that would mean squeezing everything tighter!

Rob

[bertrand35]

For Mixes?

snapshot_07.png (1.47 KiB) Viewed 9828 times

or

snapshot_08.png (1.46 KiB) Viewed 9826 times

Bertrand.

[bertrand35]

For Flight Phases ?

snapshot_09.png (1.4 KiB) Viewed 9825 times

Bertrand.

[bertrand35]

For Function Switches ?

snapshot_10.png (1.1 KiB) Viewed 9823 times

Bertrand.

[mhotar]

CHx, FPx, Function swithches looks great.
It looks "W" is a only problem, but acceptable.
I have also tried:

snapshot_53.png (1.6 KiB) Viewed 9821 times

snapshot_50.png (1.79 KiB) Viewed 9821 times

[mhotar]

Ah.. oh well

Maybe on the left? But that would mean squeezing everything tighter!

Rob

Some pictures:

snapshot_52.png (1.62 KiB) Viewed 9818 times

snapshot_51.png (1.5 KiB) Viewed 9818 times

[bertrand35]

I am afraid it will be impossible to see at the field, no?
Bertrand.

[Peter]

Rates are looking good!
For mixers the output label "CH1" is not handy, it should be per mix. Maybe the input label "Ail"?
Changing the SW to CS seems a good solution and a more intuitive label.

[Kilrah]

Rates are looking good!
For mixers the output label "CH1" is not handy, it should be per mix.

It is per mix. For other lines it's the Add, Replace or Multiply symbol that gets 'bolded'.

[mhotar]

I am afraid it will be impossible to see at the field, no?
Bertrand.

YES
I like bold labels more.

[bertrand35]

He is right in saying that += bolded is difficult to see !
I also like the CS idea instead of SW.
Bertrand.

[bertrand35]

I discovered that somebody (thus / erazz ?) thought to keys double click. There is "dead" code around this in checkIncDec(...) function. I remove it for now. Will save some flash.
@Mike, it's also in er9x
Bertrand.

[jhsa]

I wonder how much dead code is still in there??

Well done..

[mhotar]

He is right in saying that += bolded is difficult to see !
I also like the CS idea instead of SW.
Bertrand.

Yes it is true.
Bold the weight numbers then?
I have also tried, but not happy with:

snapshot_56.png (1.63 KiB) Viewed 9801 times

snapshot_55.png (1.65 KiB) Viewed 9801 times

snapshot_54.png (1.65 KiB) Viewed 9801 times

[bertrand35]

I think I will prefer highlight the "source" column. Agree?
Bertrand.

[mhotar]

Yes
Numbers could be small - short enough to be seen.

[bertrand35]

Here we are:

snapshot_11.png (1.46 KiB) Viewed 9781 times

snapshot_12.png (1.77 KiB) Viewed 9781 times

snapshot_13.png (1.2 KiB) Viewed 9781 times

snapshot_14.png (1.2 KiB) Viewed 9781 times

snapshot_15.png (1.4 KiB) Viewed 9781 times

Bertrand.