Search found 9 matches

by rcnobel
Sun Jun 28, 2020 12:03 pm
Forum: er9x
Topic: Update versions for TGY9X
Replies: 5
Views: 4003

Re: Update versions for TGY9X

Hi I am currently running ver 822 and was wondering if there are any plans for a further update to support more of the newer protocols on the MP module. As it stands right now up to protocol #39 I get a protocol name, after that I just get a number which is meaningless.On my T12 I have all 67 named...
by rcnobel
Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:14 pm
Forum: er9x
Topic: rewritten protocol frskyX v1and v2.1.0
Replies: 6
Views: 4422

Re: rewritten protocol frskyX v1and v2.1.0

No, has nothing to do with it. "Full telemetry support" has always been there, what's sent is determined by the connected in your case iNav, you need to look at its doc to see what each value means and what's configurable. Ok thanks Kilrah. You are correct. Found some info about what T2 =...
by rcnobel
Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:45 pm
Forum: er9x
Topic: rewritten protocol frskyX v1and v2.1.0
Replies: 6
Views: 4422

Re: rewritten protocol frskyX v1and v2.1.0

If using inav, then I think the "number of sats" is sent in the temperature1 sensor value. Try setting up a custom telemetry screen with "T1=" selected and see if that gives the correct value. Mike Hi. T1 gives me a value of 11-12 when i power up the quad, It looks like a real t...
by rcnobel
Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:34 pm
Forum: er9x
Topic: rewritten protocol frskyX v1and v2.1.0
Replies: 6
Views: 4422

Re: rewritten protocol frskyX v1and v2.1.0

I'm not aware that any FrSky sensors provide the "number of sats" information. If you have this information being sent, what is sending it and in what format? I will be adding multi-protocol module protocols above 63 as soon as I can, I've just done that for erskyTx. What is "ect&quo...
by rcnobel
Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:23 pm
Forum: er9x
Topic: rewritten protocol frskyX v1and v2.1.0
Replies: 6
Views: 4422

rewritten protocol frskyX v1and v2.1.0

Hello I have read that multiprotocol has released some new protocols and rewriten the frskyX. I would like to have full telemetry support from my frskyX receivers, for example display number of sats. Will there be any support in future er9x releases? Something similar to OpenTX latest 2.3.8 nightly ...
by rcnobel
Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:45 am
Forum: er9x
Topic: ER9x and multiprotocol problems
Replies: 55
Views: 34885

Re: ER9x and multiprotocol problems

Ok , just want to confirm that it works but after digging about setting RATE option to T-RATE. What a pain to get it working. With a frsky D16 no need to do that. The only thing i see is that RSSI maximizes at 75. I want to correct that i have a flit10 and not a fli14+. Now is time to test it on the...
by rcnobel
Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:23 pm
Forum: er9x
Topic: ER9x and multiprotocol problems
Replies: 55
Views: 34885

Re: ER9x and multiprotocol problems

The radio type actually just defines whether the MPM is using MULTI_STATUS or MULTI_TELEMETRY. The "er9xProv822n" test version supports MULTI_TELEMETRY, so works with the "openTx" version of the MPM firmware. Mike Ok fantastic. I Will do that then and flash er9xProv822n on the r...
by rcnobel
Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:05 pm
Forum: er9x
Topic: ER9x and multiprotocol problems
Replies: 55
Views: 34885

Re: ER9x and multiprotocol problems

Wiring looks OK. To get AFHDS2A telemetry you need "er9xProv822n" (recently posted), and the MPM needs to be flashed with non-inverted firmware (for your wiring) and also the openTx (MULTI_TELEMETRY) version. Mike Hi Mike thanks for you attencion and your extrordinary good work. Do you me...
by rcnobel
Thu Mar 19, 2020 9:57 am
Forum: er9x
Topic: ER9x and multiprotocol problems
Replies: 55
Views: 34885

Re: ER9x and multiprotocol problems

Hello. Hope i can post my first question here about multiprotocol modules. I have an old turnigy 9x v2 laying around flashed with er9x-128 , also an irangex irx4 plus multiprotocol module. And i have a fli14+ receiver IBUS. I did the telemetry mod based on oscarling site without rs232 level converte...

Go to advanced search