openrcforums

The test version of er9x-2561 should support voice:
http://openrcforums.com/forum/viewtopic ... 561#p58477

It should make it to the repository on the next revision.

Mike.

MikeB wrote:The test version of er9x-2561 should support voice:

It should make it to the repository on the next revision.

Mike.

Thanks Mike, I'll test both OpenTx & er9x once I have the voice module installed.

Thanks guys..

João

MikeB wrote:The test version of er9x-2561 should support voice:

Mike.

Just installed the voice interface in the m2561 transmitter & she's loud (actually VERY loud) with er9x-2561. Is it just me or is the voice a lot louder on er9x? I like the MegaSound sound mode option BTW!

I have the OpenTx numbered sound files on the microSD card, so the voice doesn't make sense at all, but works well. Beeper & Haptic also work, as does the backlight through the voice interface. It's getting late, so I'll test telemetry & the rest tomorrow.

As soon as Bertrand gets a voice version of OpenTx to me, I can wrap up the testing.

Anyone know why I can't back up & restore my EEPROM after flashing? I get the "Bad EEprom Data" every time, and it's a PITA the enter the models using the buttons...

Using:

I seem to remember that the firmware that is on most USBASPs had trouble with at least the 2560 and fails to access the eeprom correctly, probably the 2561 too ...
There is a patched version somewhere that Romolo posted.

EDIT: Do you mean the error is from the USBASP and also present in case of "raw" backup (read/write to file), or from C9X?
The answer above would apply to the first case. I don't think C9X actually supports the 2561's eeprom format yet. FW must be well tested and working first.

The next revision of eepe should support the '2561. My testing used my STK500 however with the '2561 in the STK501 top board.
I successfully read the EEPROM.

Mike.

The fuses for the m2561 are quite different from the m64/m128. I'm currently using the fuses I got from mhotar:
MikeB suggested I disable JTAG that otherwise upsets some of the A2D signals, and I'm going to try preserve the EEPROM:
Can someone validate the fuse settings to make sure I'm ok? More specifically, is the clock setting

"Full Swing Oscillator; Start-up time: 16K CK + 0 ms; Crystal Osc.; BOD enabled; [CKSEL=0111 SUT=01]"

ok versus the m64/m128

"Ext. Crystal/Resonator High Freq.; Start-up time: 258 CK + 4 ms; [CKSEL=1110 SUT=00]"

Kilrah wrote:I seem to remember that the firmware that is on most USBASPs had trouble with at least the 2560 and fails to access the eeprom correctly, probably the 2561 too ...
There is a patched version somewhere that Romolo posted.

EDIT: Do you mean the error is from the USBASP and also present in case of "raw" backup (read/write to file), or from C9X?
The answer above would apply to the first case. I don't think C9X actually supports the 2561's eeprom format yet. FW must be well tested and working first.

My USBASP's firmware are all patched with Romolo's version, so they work fine with no errors. I use avrdude directly, as eepe/companion don't support the 2561 yet. I do a raw read & write, but when I turn on the transmitter, I get the EEPROM error.

EDIT: I'm the one testing the m2561 firmware!!!

Just read my fuses on the '2561:
Low 0xDE
High 0xD1
Ext: 0xFF

0xFC for the extended setting would make more sense (BOD at 4.3V)

Mike.

Here is my current test version of eepe:
You can select the m2561 in the burn|configure dialog. The EEPROM will appear flagged as (m128) as the size and structure is the same.

Mike.

Today I managed to test OpenTx-m2561 pretty thoroughly. I tested models with PPM (FlySky), FrSky & my DIY DX4e DSM module and everything worked perfectly. No problems found with Sound, Voice & Haptic. I've spent at least 2 hours total flying (mostly indoors with the micro quad) without a single issue. I'll create a Wiki with all the details on the conversion soon. I know mhotar has been testing too, but it would be better if as many people as possible with different setups tried it. In my opinion it's ready to go!

Tomorrow I plan to do the same with er9x-2561.

mbanzi wrote:In my opinion it's ready to go!

Tomorrow I plan to do the same with er9x-2561.

I should agree. I spent all the weekend with my 2561/OpenTX on the field and had no issue. If the audio-mod works, it is all OK.

About the fuses. I tested both "low power" and "full swing" oscillators, both works OK. Because "full swing" is more robust to interference, I went with this, together with BOD at 4,3V. I will follow Mike, and switch JTAG off too.

So ... Time to add the 2561 target to companion?

bertrand35 wrote:So ... Time to add the 2561 target to companion?

I think so! I didn't run into any issues with openTx (or er9x-2561 for that matter). You can send me & mhotar a version to test before you release it. If I can import some of my more complex models I'll do a little more testing also.

I'm researching the M2561 upgrade on the stock 9x.

I am unable to find the option in Companion9x to download/compile the firmware for openTX for M2561 / 9x Board.

TIA

jeffreymstrong wrote:I am unable to find the option in Companion9x to download/compile the firmware for openTX for M2561 / 9x Board.

As far as I know the m2561 support for the 9x has not been added to companion yet, likely as most of the development effort has gone into supporting the Taranis. Mike has added support to eePe & er9x though, that's what I currently use.

It's been a while ago, but ...

bertrand35 wrote:So ... Time to add the 2561 target to companion?

Any chances that this still may happen?

Cheers
Klaus