OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
Moderator: rainer
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
T1 , VOLT1 , 1 , 1 , 0
With T1 show both receivers 125 instead of 12.5
If I use: T1 , VOLT1 , 1 , 10 , 0
The display is 12 instead of 12.5
But the speech is "degree" instead of volts!
The telemetry settings on the Taranis are identical for both receivers!
Unfortunately I only have little knowledge of programming in Basic.
My thought:
If OXS recognizes a Sport receiver, then
#define SETUP_DATA_TO_SEND \
Vfas, VOLT1, 10, 1, 0
otherwise
Vfas, VOLT1, 1, 1, 0
would that be a possibility?
Hans
With T1 show both receivers 125 instead of 12.5
If I use: T1 , VOLT1 , 1 , 10 , 0
The display is 12 instead of 12.5
But the speech is "degree" instead of volts!
The telemetry settings on the Taranis are identical for both receivers!
Unfortunately I only have little knowledge of programming in Basic.
My thought:
If OXS recognizes a Sport receiver, then
#define SETUP_DATA_TO_SEND \
Vfas, VOLT1, 10, 1, 0
otherwise
Vfas, VOLT1, 1, 1, 0
would that be a possibility?
Hans
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
OK.
running with one firmware!
https://code.google.com/p/openxsensor/s ... r_v2.4.rar
thankyou mstrens
running with one firmware!
https://code.google.com/p/openxsensor/s ... r_v2.4.rar
thankyou mstrens
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
oXs vario for FrSky (works also with MPX) with BMP180 sensor for 3,50 Euro.
br KH ... and thank you to all involved in that project
br KH ... and thank you to all involved in that project
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
Nice work. Is it as accurate as the other more expensive sensor?
Thanks
João
P.S. - Watched your youtube video and didn't know the taranis could read the news..... in German.. It's a hell of a radio Can it also do it in Portuguese??
Thanks
João
P.S. - Watched your youtube video and didn't know the taranis could read the news..... in German.. It's a hell of a radio Can it also do it in Portuguese??
My er9x/Ersky9x/eepskye Video Tutorials
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5uJhoD7sAKidZmkhMpYpp_qcuIqJXhb9
Donate to Er9x/Ersky9x:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=YHX43JR3J7XGW
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5uJhoD7sAKidZmkhMpYpp_qcuIqJXhb9
Donate to Er9x/Ersky9x:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=YHX43JR3J7XGW
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
Hi João.
No, I don't think, it is as accurate as the MS5611. Klaus (see the rcline thread) did the modification of oXs ver.3.0 for support of the BMP180 and he did not post his experience so far. I am now the second one with oXs + BMP180.
br KH
... and it is DEUTSCHLANDFUNK, not the Taranis. I did not realize, that there was sound recording
No, I don't think, it is as accurate as the MS5611. Klaus (see the rcline thread) did the modification of oXs ver.3.0 for support of the BMP180 and he did not post his experience so far. I am now the second one with oXs + BMP180.
br KH
... and it is DEUTSCHLANDFUNK, not the Taranis. I did not realize, that there was sound recording
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
My er9x/Ersky9x/eepskye Video Tutorials
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5uJhoD7sAKidZmkhMpYpp_qcuIqJXhb9
Donate to Er9x/Ersky9x:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=YHX43JR3J7XGW
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5uJhoD7sAKidZmkhMpYpp_qcuIqJXhb9
Donate to Er9x/Ersky9x:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=YHX43JR3J7XGW
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:56 pm
- Country: -
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
How much worse is the bmp180 compared to the 5611?
My main purpose is vario tones, I have the frsky normal precision vario and don't find it a lot of use apart from in a dlg for launch height , the high precision and ms5611 openxsensor is much more useful as vario.
Where can I find the code with the bmp180 code in?
For less then £1 I might just get one and try it myself, any input welcomed.
Thanks.
My main purpose is vario tones, I have the frsky normal precision vario and don't find it a lot of use apart from in a dlg for launch height , the high precision and ms5611 openxsensor is much more useful as vario.
Where can I find the code with the bmp180 code in?
For less then £1 I might just get one and try it myself, any input welcomed.
Thanks.
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
You find it here. It is version 4.0 (FrSky and MPX protocol. MS5611 and BMP180 sensor)nigelsheffield wrote: Where can I find the code with the bmp180 code in?
https://github.com/openXsensor/openXsensor
br
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:56 pm
- Country: -
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
Thanks, I will order one just out of interest, I already have more varios then receivers lol but 85 pence for a sensor and I already have q spare pro mini I can do a comparison if nothing else , I wonder if using it as a second sensor as total energy sensor along with my ms 5611 varios would work?
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
In order to build build a pneumatically total energy sensor with you need only one baro sensor. It could be a MS5611 or a BMP180.
You can use 2 baro sensors if you want to get the altitude or an uncompensated vertical speed too.
For an electronically total energy sensor you need a baro sensor + an airspeed sensor (at least with oXs).
You can use 2 baro sensors if you want to get the altitude or an uncompensated vertical speed too.
For an electronically total energy sensor you need a baro sensor + an airspeed sensor (at least with oXs).
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:56 pm
- Country: -
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
Thanks, so which is easiest , basically I want altitude and vario tones like I have but the vario tones not be effected by me pulling the nose up and giving false lift tones.
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
In order to get a compensated vario (providing dte), you have 2 basic options:
- pneumatically compensated vario: use one MS5611 sensor and connect it to a TEK probe. More info on TELK probe on this link : viewtopic.php?f=86&t=5856&p=83775&hilit=TEK#p83775
Pro: cheaper (if you build the probe your self)
Con : TEK probe needs some calibration for optimal result.
- electronically compensated vario : use a MS5611 sensor and an airspeed sensor + a Prandtl probe.
Pro : normally no calibration needed
Prandl probe available on the web.
Con : price of the airspeed sensor
Prandl probe is perhaps not so easy to build (I made one using 2 part of an old 35mHz antenna)
Some other users (Carbo?) can perhaps share their experience here.
- pneumatically compensated vario: use one MS5611 sensor and connect it to a TEK probe. More info on TELK probe on this link : viewtopic.php?f=86&t=5856&p=83775&hilit=TEK#p83775
Pro: cheaper (if you build the probe your self)
Con : TEK probe needs some calibration for optimal result.
- electronically compensated vario : use a MS5611 sensor and an airspeed sensor + a Prandtl probe.
Pro : normally no calibration needed
Prandl probe available on the web.
Con : price of the airspeed sensor
Prandl probe is perhaps not so easy to build (I made one using 2 part of an old 35mHz antenna)
Some other users (Carbo?) can perhaps share their experience here.
Re: OpenXSensor SPORT Interface
Two additional remarks:
With a Prandl probe you have the airspeed-value to optimize your plane in different flight-modes.
The TEK-Probe fits for me better in V-tail planes (mounted in the fuselage in front of the wing), on T-tail planes i prefer a Prandl-probe, mounted in the vertical fin. The vario-compensation and the flyability is exactly the same in both versions.
With a Prandl probe you have the airspeed-value to optimize your plane in different flight-modes.
The TEK-Probe fits for me better in V-tail planes (mounted in the fuselage in front of the wing), on T-tail planes i prefer a Prandl-probe, mounted in the vertical fin. The vario-compensation and the flyability is exactly the same in both versions.